Land+Living
Land+Living
Sustainability Planning: First, Do No Harm
Could "sustainability planning" actually harm long term sustainability?
A paper by Peter Gordon of the University of Southern California takes an interesting look at sustainable planning and policy and suggests that long term sustainability may be hampered by some current "solutions."

Perhaps a bit academic for L+L? Nah... it pays to be informed. Take a break from the eye candy and read up.

Link: Sustainability Planning: First, Do No Harm (500k PDF file)
Link: USC Urban Initiative
Via: Planetizen

From the abstract:

Many observers see the world as having “problems” that cry out for “solutions”. Yet, more than one wise man has noted that there are no “solutions”, only trade-offs. Looked at in this way, many of the “solutions” that fall under the heading “sustainability planning” must be carefully reconsidered. There is also good news, however. Much of humanity has reached heights of material welfare that were unimaginable just a few generations ago. How we got to where we are demands an explanation. The only one we have points to a virtuous cycle: well-defined property rights beget prosperity and more prosperous people demand clearer property rights. The long-term evolution has not been (could not have been) a smooth one but it is, nevertheless, powerful and must be properly understood. Flexible markets and institutions facilitate the virtuous cycle. Being open-ended, they have been well suited dealing with the inherently unknowable future. The virtuous cycle and sustained growth is the real way to a sustainable future. In contrast, much of proposed “sustainability planning” appears to foreclose options and flexibility – and real sustainability.

 Comments (1)
Susan Stirling  — January 17, 2005
Susan Stirling
I agree flexibility is important. Some of our "solutions" are close-ended and rigid. I question how long we can sustain "sustained growth" but am not aware of a solution.
back to top ↑