The students analyzed the site; the history of the Yellow Car system, use, contamination, urban and regional context, socio-economic data, etc. The combined research and data was compiled in a template format of 11x17 pages which were laminated and traded around the studio during the course of the project. These pages were plastered on an entire wall at the review providing the jurors with a wealth of background information.

EXISTING SITE CONDITION
Studio Brief
The contingencies of remediation timelines, changing technologies,
uncertain economics, and fluid politics demand an alternative to
common Masterplanning processes which typically suggest a final
project or vision which remains inflexible to variation. Also, the
public is typically not involved in the remediation process. Such and approach tends to amplify negative perceptions of a place, reinforcing a communities geo-psychological disconnect from a site and it's potentially instructive histories.
Our goal is to suggest alternative approaches to site healing and to approach remediation and redevelopment from social, cultural,
historical, ecological, artistic and environmental perspectives. The focus of the brownlab is to create a forum to investigate remediation technologies and to apply them to a redevelopment. Here, the redevelopment strategy is used as a vehicle for engaging communities, ecologies, and stakeholders, for changing perceptions, for initiating processes of transformation that unfold over a period of years, beginning with remediation. Strategies should balance aesthetic, environmental, cultural and economic needs. They would lay the groundwork for extensive private reinvestment, allowing for business expansion and redevelopment while suggesting innovative, yet not untested ecological technologies that can solve infrastructural needs
while improving environmental health, social/recreational
opportunities, and site image.

HISTORIC VIEW OF SITE

SITE VISIT
The studio participants were: Claire Cottrell, Veenu Jayavam, Erin Lau, Catie Lee, Catherine McLaughlin, Jillian Morgan,
Amy Morie, Ray Nagahata, Harmil Raikhy, Kay Sales and Naomi Sanders.
So, finally, the student work I have been promising, in alphhabetical order (2 here, more to come).
Claire Cottrell
Garden Cinema

SITE PLAN
Claire’s proposal for the site was as a community park by day and an activated gathering place for film by night. The roofs of the structures would be removed to facilitate remediation, and the walls would be left as a framework for the landscape and as projection surfaces.
Groves anchor the corners of the park and create points of entry. Rows of corral trees within the concrete walls help define the "screening rooms." A large rectangular retention pond at the center of the site seasonally collects runoff. An ephemeral zone of commerce, providing an armature for the vending carts and wandering merchants who occasionally occupy the existing swap meet, is also defined.

SITE MODEL

PRESENTATION

PERSPECTIVES

DESIGN ELEMENTS
Veenu Jayavam

SITE MODEL
Veenu envisioned the site as primarily an open space, an ecological habitat in the city. The secondary functions of use would incorporate the exisiting swap meet with an expanded commerce zone for store spaces as well as transient functions such as a farmers market. The existing maintenance facility would be used as a technical institute. A series of "kiosks of historical refernce" would be spread across the site to provide educational information.
The landscape would be sculpted as part of the remediation process, creating landforms layered organically (like lava flows) onto the site. An amphitheater would be carved out between the structures at the center of the site, and a water retention pond would be created on the western edge.

PHASING DIAGRAMS

SITE SECTION (fragment)

SITE SECTION (fragment)